QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

DHS launches 4-year maritime surveillance pilot with minimal public oversight

S. 1103 — Vessel Tracking for Sanctions Enforcement Act of 2025 · Filed by Maggie Hassan (D-NH) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 25, 2025 · Referred to committee

72%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
28/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Sanctions Enforcement Surveillance Pilot

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill directs the Department of Homeland Security to run a 4-year pilot program using big-data analytics to detect ships that may be evading U.S. sanctions or export controls, particularly by disabling or manipulating their Automatic Identification System (AIS). The program will analyze vessel data (cargo type, destination, ownership, proximity to other vessels, AIS outages) and share intelligence with U.S. law enforcement, other federal agencies, and foreign partner nations. The bill requires a final report assessing whether the program works and whether it should continue, but does not authorize new data collection beyond what is already legal.

Why we flagged it

The bill establishes a 4-year pilot program using big data analytics to detect vessel sanctions evasion, focusing on Automatic Identification System (AIS) manipulation as a detection signal. It is fundamentally a law-enforcement and national-security measure, not a commemorative or appropriations rider.

What the text implies

  • The pilot program may normalize large-scale maritime data collection and analysis without explicit statutory authorization for new data gathering, relying on a narrow carve-out ('not otherwise authorized by existing law') that could be interpreted expansively by DHS.
  • Sharing of vessel-tracking intelligence with foreign partners creates potential for misuse or diplomatic friction if partner nations use the data for purposes beyond sanctions enforcement.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Defense contractors and cybersecurity firms specializing in big-data analytics and maritime surveill; Insurance and maritime logistics companies that may benefit from reduced sanctions-evasion risk; Financial institutions (mapped stocks: AIG, PRU, PFG) with exposure to maritime trade finance and sa

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record