Federal buildings must now use American timber—at what cost?
S. 1094 — Mass Timber Federal Buildings Act of 2025 · Filed by Jeff Merkley (D-OR) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 24, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the federal government to prioritize using mass timber (engineered wood products) in the construction and renovation of federal buildings, with a preference for timber sourced from U.S. facilities and forests managed through responsible forestry practices. The bill mandates a lifecycle assessment to measure the environmental impact of these timber-based buildings and requires a report to Congress within 180 days of enactment.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a federal contracting preference for mass timber products sourced domestically and from responsibly managed forests. It is functionally a procurement policy with environmental and rural-development objectives, not a deregulation or subsidy in the traditional sense.
What the text implies
- The 'maximum extent achievable' language gives the Administrator and Secretary broad discretion to define feasibility, potentially allowing circumvention of the preference if cost or supply constraints are cited without explicit thresholds.
- The bill does not establish a cost-comparison mechanism or cap on price premiums for mass timber versus conventional materials, meaning federal agencies could face significantly higher construction budgets without legislative oversight.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
mass timber manufacturers and processors; forestry companies with certified sustainable operations; small and tribal forest owners (if sourcing preferences are enforced)