Pipeline bill quietly expands federal crimes to cover protest and activism
S. 1017 — Safe and Secure Transportation of American Energy Act · Filed by Tim Sheehy (R-MT) · 9 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 13, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill expands federal criminal penalties for pipeline interference by adding four new prohibited acts—vandalizing, tampering with, disrupting operation/construction, and preventing operation/construction—to the existing crimes of damaging or destroying pipelines. The bill does not change the penalty itself, only the conduct that triggers it.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a straightforward expansion of federal criminal penalties for pipeline interference. It adds four new categories of prohibited conduct to an existing criminal statute without changing the penalty structure itself.
What the text implies
- The phrase 'disrupting the operation or construction of' a pipeline is broad enough to encompass protest, blockade, or civil disobedience that does not involve physical contact or damage, potentially criminalizing First Amendment activity.
- The phrase 'preventing the operation or construction of' could be read to criminalize advocacy, organizing, or legal obstruction (e.g., permitting challenges) that delays or blocks pipeline projects, depending on prosecutorial interpretation.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
pipeline operators and energy infrastructure companies; oil and gas producers