House impeaches Defense Secretary over alleged extrajudicial killings and classified leak
H.Res. 935 — Impeaching Peter B. Hegseth, Secretary of Defense of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors. · Filed by Shri Thanedar (D-MI) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Dec 9, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This is a House resolution impeaching Secretary of Defense Peter Hegseth on two charges: (1) murder and conspiracy to murder, alleging he ordered lethal strikes on small boats in the Caribbean and Pacific without congressional authorization, including a second strike on shipwrecked survivors; and (2) reckless mishandling of classified information, alleging he discussed sensitive military operational details including Yemen airstrike timing and targeting on an unsecured commercial messaging app (Signal) that was inadvertently shared with a journalist. The resolution asserts these actions violate federal criminal law and international law of war.
Why we flagged it
This is a non-binding impeachment resolution—a formal accusation mechanism under the Constitution. It does not enact law, appropriate funds, or regulate conduct; it initiates a removal proceeding. The character is procedural and constitutional, not substantive policy.
What the text implies
- If passed, this resolution would trigger a Senate trial under the impeachment clause (Art. II, Sec. 4), requiring a two-thirds supermajority (67 votes) for removal. The political feasibility is low given current Senate composition, but passage would create a formal record of the allegations and force a public trial.
- The allegations describe potential violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and the War Crimes Act (18 U.S.C. § 2441), which could expose the Secretary to criminal liability independent of impeachment. A Senate acquittal would not bar criminal prosecution.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who it affects
The resolution itself changes no law and imposes no direct cost or benefit on ordinary citizens—it is a procedural accusation that would require Senate trial for removal. However, the allegations, if true, describe serious breaches of military command authority and national security protocol that would affect public trust in defense leadership and military conduct.