Congress demands ICE defunding, impeachment over deaths in custody
H.Res. 1030 — To end ICE abuse. · Filed by Ro Khanna (D-CA) · Introduced Feb 2, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This resolution calls for Congress to defund ICE, repeal its $75 billion budget allocation, end qualified immunity for ICE agents, launch impeachment proceedings against DHS Secretary Kristi Noem and Attorney General Pam Bondi, investigate and prosecute ICE agents for alleged violations, ban racial profiling and militarized enforcement tactics, establish a uniform use-of-force standard, replace ICE with a new DOJ agency with civilian oversight, require body cameras and visible ID for agents, and enforce human rights standards in immigration detention. The resolution is framed around recent deaths of U.S. citizens and detainees allegedly caused by ICE actions.
Why we flagged it
The resolution's core function is to impose structural accountability, transparency, and constitutional compliance on ICE operations through defunding, impeachment, qualified immunity removal, and agency restructuring. It is fundamentally a governance and civil-rights reform measure, not a funding or appropriations bill.
What the text implies
- Defunding DHS entirely (not just ICE) would affect border security, customs enforcement, FEMA disaster response, and TSA operations—far broader than immigration enforcement alone.
- Impeachment of sitting Cabinet officials (Noem, Bondi) is a dramatic escalation that, if passed, would trigger Senate trial and removal proceedings; the resolution does not specify grounds beyond 'failing to uphold constitutional standards,' which is vague.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Ordinary citizens—particularly immigrants, people in ICE custody, and communities subject to enforcement operations—would gain stronger constitutional protections, transparency, accountability mechanisms, and reduced risk of lethal force or abuse. The resolution prioritizes due process, civil rights enforcement, and independent oversight over unchecked agency authority.