House votes to fine Clintons $5,000 daily for subpoena defiance
H.Res. 1015 — Recommending that the House of Representatives find William J. Clinton and Hillary R. Clinton in contempt of Congress for refusal to comply with a subpoena duly issued by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. · Filed by Anna Luna (R-FL) · Introduced Jan 22, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This resolution recommends that the House find William J. Clinton and Hillary R. Clinton in contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with a subpoena from the Oversight Committee, and imposes a $5,000-per-day fine on each of them for continued non-compliance. The Speaker is directed to enforce the subpoena and the resolution.
Why we flagged it
This is a non-binding resolution expressing the House's intent to find specific named individuals in contempt and impose fines for subpoena non-compliance. It is a procedural and political instrument, not legislation that changes law or appropriates funds.
What the text implies
- The resolution does not state what the underlying subpoena demands or why it was issued, leaving the public unable to judge whether the contempt finding serves legitimate oversight or is retaliatory.
- A $5,000-per-day fine structure creates escalating financial pressure on private citizens without a statutory cap or sunset, potentially reaching millions of dollars over time.
- The resolution invokes the House's 'inherent power' to fine, which is constitutionally contested and has rarely been used against private citizens; enforcement mechanism and legal standing are unclear.
- No provision addresses whether the named individuals have raised valid legal objections (executive privilege, attorney-client privilege, etc.) to the subpoena—the resolution assumes non-compliance is willful.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Congressional contempt authority and subpoena enforcement are legitimate oversight tools that protect democratic accountability. However, the resolution names specific private citizens (not sitting officials) and imposes financial penalties without stating the underlying subpoena's subject matter, scope, or justification—making it impossible to assess whether the demand itself serves the public interest or is politically motivated.
Named in the bill
William J. Clinton, Hillary R. Clinton, House of Representatives, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Speaker of the House, Mrs. Luna (sponsor)
Where it stands
- Jan 22, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Rules · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Rules”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (1,579 characters) on Jul 5, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“House votes to fine Clintons $5,000 daily for subpoena defiance” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hres1015 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.