Congress expands paid-leave tax credit—but only for employers who volunteer
H.R. 996 — Paid Family and Medical Leave Tax Credit Extension and Enhancement Act · Filed by Randy Feenstra (R-IA) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 5, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill extends and enhances a federal tax credit that reimburses employers for wages paid to employees on family or medical leave, or for insurance premiums covering such leave. It increases the credit's generosity, expands eligibility to part-time workers (20+ hours/week), allows employers to claim the credit for up to 6 months of leave instead of just 1 year, and requires the Small Business Administration and IRS to conduct outreach to help employers understand and use the credit.
Why we flagged it
The bill's functional effect is to expand a tax credit that reimburses employers for paid-leave costs. While framed as worker-friendly, the mechanism is a corporate tax benefit—employers choose whether to offer leave, and the public bears the cost through foregone revenue.
What the text implies
- The credit is voluntary and employer-controlled: employers decide whether to offer leave and claim the credit. Workers without employer participation remain unprotected, perpetuating inequality in access to paid leave.
- Tax-subsidy approach is regressive: larger employers with sophisticated tax planning are more likely to claim the credit than small businesses, despite SBA outreach efforts. The benefit concentrates among well-resourced firms.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
Insurance companies offering paid-leave policies (AIG, PRU, PFG, FBK, FMAO); Large employers with sophisticated tax compliance infrastructure; Payroll service providers and tax professionals (indirect)