QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress moves to close offshore tax loopholes used by multinational corporations

H.R. 995 — No Tax Breaks for Outsourcing Act · Filed by Lloyd Doggett (D-TX) · 138 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 5, 2025 · Referred to committee

35%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
25/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernCorporate Tax Enforcement Measure

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill eliminates tax breaks that allow U.S. corporations to reduce their tax burden by shifting profits and operations overseas. It closes loopholes in the foreign tax credit system, eliminates preferential tax rates for foreign-earned income, tightens rules on corporate inversions (when U.S. companies relocate abroad on paper), and limits interest deductions for multinational corporations. The bill applies country-by-country tracking of foreign income and treats foreign corporations managed from the U.S. as domestic for tax purposes.

Why we flagged it

The bill's functional purpose is to eliminate tax avoidance mechanisms used by multinational corporations and increase effective tax rates on offshore profits. Despite its title emphasizing 'no tax breaks for outsourcing,' the substance is broader: it restructures the foreign tax credit system, closes inversion loopholes, and imposes country-by-country income tracking.

What the text implies

  • The country-by-country application of foreign tax credit limitations (Section 3) creates a new administrative burden on the IRS to track and allocate income across multiple jurisdictions, potentially requiring significant new regulatory guidance and compliance infrastructure.
  • The 'inverted domestic corporation' definition (Section 5) retroactively applies to acquisitions completed after December 22, 2017, potentially exposing corporations that completed transactions years ago to reclassification and back-tax liability within a 3-year assessment window.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

U.S. federal government (increased tax revenue); Individual taxpayers (reduced relative tax burden)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record