QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress moves to ban addictive AI chatbots targeting minors

H.R. 9948 — Addictive Design Act of 2026 · Filed by Becca Balint (D-VT) · 4 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 27, 2026 · Referred to committee

82%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Youth Mental Health Protection Measure

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill directs the President to establish a federal task force to study how AI chatbots with addictive design features (like avatars, emotional mimicry, and extended conversations) harm youth mental health, and authorizes $8 million in grants for research and parent/teacher outreach. It also prohibits companies from offering AI chatbots with these addictive features to anyone under 18, with civil penalties up to $10 million for non-compliance and $5,000 per violation for offering prohibited features.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a prohibition on addictive design features in AI chatbots targeting minors, paired with research and public education grants. This is a consumer protection / public health measure, not a tax, subsidy, or deregulation.

What the text implies

  • The definition of 'addictive design features' is broad and prescriptive (typing bubbles, avatars, storing conversation history, conversations over 2 hours), which may force significant product redesigns for AI chatbot providers and could affect legitimate features used for accessibility or user experience.
  • The bill grants research institutions broad data-access rights from covered entities (Section 5), with $10M civil penalties for non-compliance. This creates a new regulatory pathway for academic researchers to compel disclosure of proprietary AI training data and user interaction patterns.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Academic institutions (research grants); Non-profit organizations and community-based organizations (outreach grants); Mental health service providers (potential referral pathway from chatbot warnings)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record