Private equity health care firms face new licensing, reporting, and escrow rules
H.R. 9910 — Health Over Wealth Act · Filed by Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 23, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a comprehensive regulatory framework for private equity ownership of health care entities. It requires for-profit health care companies (especially those owned by private equity) to report detailed financial, operational, and workforce data to the federal government; establishes a licensing system for private equity firms investing in health care; creates an escrow requirement to protect against facility closures; restricts real estate investment trust arrangements that weaken health care finances; establishes a task force to study private equity's role in health care; and strengthens hospital closure notification and mitigation requirements. The bill also elevates pension obligations in bankruptcy and restricts investment companies from stripping assets from health care entities.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a regulatory licensing and reporting regime targeting private equity ownership of health care entities. It is not a ban but a transparency and accountability framework with enforcement teeth (license denial, civil penalties, divestment requirements).
- Section 4 amends title 11 (bankruptcy code) to elevate pension withdrawal liability and reorder claim priorities. Substantively unrelated to private equity health care regulation.
- Section 6 amends IRC 856 to exclude rents from qualified health care property from REIT income. Related to health care financing but operates through tax code, not health care regulation.
What the text implies
- The escrow requirement (5-year operating/capital reserve) may force private equity firms to reduce leverage or exit health care investments, potentially reducing capital availability to health care providers.
- Licensing denial and divestment authority grant the Secretary broad discretion to define 'price gauging,' 'understaffing,' and 'access barriers'—undefined terms that could be weaponized or applied inconsistently.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
Community health centers and non-profit health care providers (supplemental funding in closure scena; Health care workers and labor organizations (enhanced bankruptcy priority, workforce protections); National Health Service Corps and health workforce programs (licensing fee revenue)