Banks lose federal privileges if they refuse service to lawful but unpopular businesses
H.R. 987 — Fair Access to Banking Act · Filed by Andy Barr (R-KY) · 110 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 5, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits large banks, credit unions, and payment card networks from denying financial services to lawful businesses based on subjective 'reputational risk' or political considerations. Instead, banks must make lending and service decisions using only quantitative, risk-based criteria applied uniformly to all customers in their market. Violations trigger civil lawsuits with treble damages and attorney fees, and large banks lose access to Federal Reserve discount window and ACH network privileges if they refuse service to compliant customers.
Why we flagged it
The bill frames itself as a fair-access and anti-discrimination measure (preventing arbitrary exclusion of lawful businesses), but its operative effect is to restrict banks' ability to use categorical risk screening and reputational assessment — a form of deregulation that shifts compliance burden from financial institutions to courts and weakens their discretion in risk management.
What the text implies
- Banks may respond by raising prices or tightening quantitative standards across the board to offset reduced ability to screen by category, potentially harming creditworthy customers in disfavored sectors who now face higher costs rather than exclusion.
- The bill's definition of 'covered bank' (>$50B assets) creates a two-tier system: large banks face strict fair-access requirements while smaller banks retain discretion, potentially concentrating risk in smaller institutions and fragmenting the banking system.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
Businesses in politically disfavored but lawful sectors (firearms manufacturers, energy companies, c; Litigation firms specializing in banking disputes; Smaller regional banks (exempted from coverage if <$50B assets)