QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress orders study on sharing your location with suicide crisis line

H.R. 9814 — 988 Lifeline Location Improvement Act of 2026 · Filed by Joe Neguse (D-CO) · 6 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 21, 2026 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
8/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Public Safety Study Directive

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill directs the FCC to study how to transmit caller location information to the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline, and requires the Government Accountability Office to report on the technical, legal, privacy, and cost challenges of doing so. The bill does not mandate location-sharing itself—it only requires investigation and recommendations on whether and how it could work.

Why we flagged it

The bill's sole operative mechanism is to commission two studies (FCC notice of inquiry and GAO report) on a specific public-health problem—enabling location-sharing for suicide prevention calls. It creates no new mandate, no private carve-out, and no regulatory change; it is purely investigative and deliberative.

What the text implies

  • The bill's outcome depends entirely on FCC and GAO findings; if studies conclude location-sharing is infeasible or privacy-prohibitive, no mandate will follow—the bill creates no automatic trigger for regulation.
  • Cost recovery language suggests future implementation may require telecommunications providers to absorb or pass through costs; the study will assess funding models, but this bill does not impose costs itself.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who it affects

The bill creates a pathway to potentially improve emergency response for people in crisis by enabling location-based dispatch to the 988 lifeline, which could save lives. The study explicitly requires evaluation of privacy protections and consumer safeguards, ensuring that any future implementation would be informed by public interest considerations rather than imposed without deliberation.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record