Congress caps ultra-wealthy retirement accounts, but catches middle-class savers too
H.R. 9813 — To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose limitations on high-income taxpayers with large retirement account balances. · Filed by Richard Neal (D-MA) · Introduced Jul 21, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill caps retirement account contributions for high-income earners (married filing jointly: $450k+ income) at $10 million total balance, and forces them to withdraw significantly more each year once they exceed that threshold. High earners with over $20 million in retirement savings must withdraw 50% of the excess annually, with mandatory 37% tax withholding on those forced withdrawals.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to impose a $10 million ceiling on retirement account balances for high-income taxpayers and force accelerated withdrawals above that threshold. This is a direct wealth-limitation measure, not a routine tax or contribution adjustment.
What the text implies
- Forced withdrawals at 50% of excess balances may trigger fire-sales of illiquid assets (private equity, real estate funds, employer stock) held in retirement accounts, potentially destabilizing those markets.
- The $450k income threshold for married filers is relatively low for high-cost-of-living areas and may ensnare dual-income professional households (two doctors, two lawyers) who are not ultra-wealthy but face forced distributions.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
U.S. Treasury (increased tax revenue from forced distributions and higher withholding); Financial advisory firms specializing in high-net-worth tax planning; Roth conversion service providers