QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress dedicates rural flood funding, bypassing wealthy jurisdictions

H.R. 9804 — SAFE Rural Act · Filed by Pat Harrigan (R-NC) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 21, 2026 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Rural Flood Resilience Funding

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a dedicated federal funding stream for flood resilience and hazard mitigation in rural communities, tribal lands, and territories. It establishes the SAFE Rural Fund by redirecting 2% of annual Disaster Relief Fund appropriations, distributes money through formula-based grants to states and tribal governments, and requires those entities to pass funds through to eligible rural counties, municipalities, and tribal organizations for projects like flood-resistant infrastructure, nature-based solutions, and emergency preparedness. The bill prioritizes low-income and high-vulnerability areas, streamlines grant applications, and includes a $1–5 million annual Community Assistance Program grant to build state and tribal capacity to administer the program.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a dedicated federal grant program for rural flood mitigation and preparedness. It amends the Stafford Act to establish a new funding stream and administrative structure, not a one-time appropriation or commemorative measure.

What the text implies

  • The 2% annual transfer from the Disaster Relief Fund may reduce post-disaster recovery resources in years of major disasters, creating a potential trade-off between pre-disaster mitigation and emergency response capacity.
  • The bill's reliance on state and tribal administrative capacity to distribute funds may perpetuate disparities if some states lack the infrastructure to effectively manage the program, despite the CAP-MIT technical assistance provision.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

rural construction and engineering firms; environmental consulting and design firms; state and tribal emergency management agencies

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record