Bill protects detained immigrant parents' custody rights and prevents family separation
H.R. 9745 — Orlin’s Law · Filed by Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) · 30 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 16, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Department of Homeland Security to identify detained immigrants who are parents of children in the U.S., release them unless they pose a clear safety risk, and protect their ability to maintain custody and contact with their children during detention and removal proceedings. It establishes an Office of Detained Parent Coordination within ICE, mandates community-based alternatives to detention, and requires quarterly public reporting on detained parents and their children.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a presumptive release rule for detained immigrant parents paired with enforceable protections for parental custody and child contact. It is fundamentally a child-welfare and due-process measure, not an immigration enforcement or detention reform bill per se—though it constrains detention practice.
What the text implies
- The bill creates a federal remedy (Section 11) allowing separated parents to demand reunification at government expense and to participate in family court proceedings even after removal—potentially creating ongoing federal obligations to facilitate cross-border parental involvement.
- The presumption in Section 6 that detention does not constitute abandonment, abuse, or neglect may shield detained parents from state child-welfare termination proceedings, effectively federalizing a state family-law determination.
- The requirement that DHS establish a community-based case management program (Section 9) outside ICE's purview may create a parallel administrative structure and funding stream, with unclear coordination with existing alternatives-to-detention programs.
- The 2-hour window to identify parental status and the prohibition on transfers to different ICE areas of responsibility may create operational friction and potential litigation over what constitutes 'exceptional circumstances' or 'legal requirement' exceptions.
- Quarterly public reporting on detained parents and child placements (Section 10) creates transparency but may also expose gaps in state child-welfare capacity and federal-state coordination, potentially triggering legislative or judicial pressure.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill protects vulnerable children from family separation and ensures detained immigrant parents retain meaningful parental rights and access to their children. It shifts the default from detention to release for parents, requires due process (clear and convincing evidence of safety risk), and creates enforceable remedies if DHS fails to comply—all of which strengthen protections for both children and parents.
Who stands to gain
- community-based case management providers
- legal services organizations
- child welfare agencies (state and local)
- family law practitioners
Named in the bill
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Office of Detained Parent Coordination, Immigration and Nationality Act, William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008, Flores Settlement Agreement, State child welfare agencies, Family courts
Where it stands
30 cosponsors: 30 Democrats.
- Jul 16, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jul 16, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 1 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $6,100 in lobbying spend. A filing names 11 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Pramila Jayapal, the sponsor, reported $289,750 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Center for Law and Social Policy (clasp) — $6,100 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 17, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (16,155 characters) on Aug 12, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 17, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Bill protects detained immigrant parents' custody rights and prevents family separation” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr9745 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.