Epstein victims, states gain power to sue DOJ for withheld records
H.R. 9694 — Epstein Files Transparency Act II · Filed by Thomas Massie (R-KY) · 7 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 15, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Epstein Files Transparency Act to expand who can sue the U.S. Attorney General for withholding or redacting documents related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. State attorneys general, district attorneys, victims, and Members of Congress gain new rights to access unredacted records, bring lawsuits for noncompliance, and obtain attorney's fees. The bill strips away common law privileges (attorney-client, work product, deliberative process) that previously allowed the DOJ to withhold documents, and imposes criminal penalties on DOJ officials who conceal or falsify records.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is to expand enforcement rights and strip away withholding privileges, making it fundamentally a transparency and accountability measure. It does not create new substantive law but rather empowers existing parties (victims, state officials, Congress) to enforce disclosure of Epstein-related records.
What the text implies
- Removal of attorney-client and work-product privileges for DOJ records may create precedent for stripping these protections in other high-profile investigations, potentially affecting DOJ litigation strategy and internal deliberations government-wide.
- The 'criminal network' definition is broad and includes entities that 'profited from' or 'concealed' Epstein conduct, potentially exposing financial institutions, media companies, and other third parties to state-level investigations and civil liability.
- State attorneys general gain independent enforcement authority over federal DOJ compliance, creating potential for coordinated multi-state litigation and political pressure on the federal government.
- Victims' standing to sue the Attorney General directly, combined with expedited docket advancement and attorney's fees, may generate high-volume litigation that diverts DOJ resources.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Victims of Epstein-related crimes gain enforceable rights to access records about their own cases, state law enforcement gains tools to investigate and prosecute, and Congress gains oversight power. The bill removes legal barriers (common law privileges) that previously allowed the DOJ to withhold documents without public justification, increasing transparency and accountability.
Named in the bill
U.S. Attorney General, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, State Attorneys General, District Attorneys, Members of Congress, Victims of Epstein/Maxwell crimes, Epstein Files Transparency Act (Public Law 119-38)
Where it stands
7 cosponsors: 6 Democrats, 1 Republicans.
- Jul 15, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jul 15, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (17,598 characters) on Sep 25, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 14,985 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-09-25.
“Epstein victims, states gain power to sue DOJ for withheld records” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr9694 Report an error