Congress shifts Medicare quality oversight to physician-led task force, caps payment cuts
H.R. 9693 — Patients First Act of 2026 · Filed by John Joyce (R-PA) · 40 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 15, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill restructures Medicare physician payment by modifying how doctors' reimbursement rates are calculated, introducing a new hybrid primary care payment model that pays practices monthly per patient instead of per service, renaming the physician quality-reporting system from MIPS to POINTS, and creating a physician-led task force to recommend quality and efficiency measures. It also adjusts geographic payment floors, limits year-to-year payment swings, and expands data access for clinical registries to conduct quality research.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a comprehensive rewrite of Medicare physician payment formulas, conversion factor updates, and quality-reporting architecture. While framed as 'Patients First,' the operative provisions are technical payment adjustments and governance changes that primarily affect physician practices and Medicare's fiscal management, not direct patient benefits.
What the text implies
- The hybrid primary care payment model (Section 102) exempts participating practices from cost-sharing, meaning Medicare beneficiaries in those practices pay $0 for designated primary care services. This creates a two-tier system: patients in hybrid practices receive free primary care, while patients in non-participating practices continue to pay copays. The bill does not address whether this cost-
- Section 204 reduces MIPS positive adjustments by 50% for 'excluded practices' (corporate-owned or non-physician-controlled) starting 2032. This creates a financial penalty for consolidation, but the penalty applies only to bonus payments, not base rates—practices may absorb the penalty and continue consolidating if corporate ownership provides other efficiencies.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
Physician practices (especially primary care and small/independent practices); Clinical data registries and specialty societies that develop quality measures; Primary care providers in the hybrid payment model