Victims gain legal power to sue if government leaks their names
H.R. 9679 — REDACT Act · Filed by Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jul 14, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a private right to sue the federal government if it improperly releases personally identifiable information (names, addresses, medical records, etc.) of victims when publishing documents under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Victims or their representatives can recover at least $50,000 per violation, plus actual damages, attorney fees, and court costs. The government waives its usual immunity from such lawsuits.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to create a private civil remedy for improper disclosure of victim information during government document release. It is a narrow, targeted accountability measure tied to a specific transparency statute (the Epstein Files Transparency Act).
What the text implies
- The $50,000 statutory minimum per instance may create significant aggregate liability if the government releases documents containing multiple victims' information or multiple data points per victim, potentially incentivizing over-redaction and reducing transparency.
- The 5-year lookback for violations discovered before enactment creates a retroactive liability window, exposing the government to claims for documents already released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
plaintiff attorneys (contingency-fee recovery of attorney fees and costs); victims and victim representatives (statutory damages and compensatory awards)