Workforce programs move from Education to Labor—no safeguards for quality or continuity
H.R. 9607 — Less Bureaucracy, Better Workforce Development Act · Filed by Tim Walberg (R-MI) · Introduced Jul 9, 2026 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill transfers career and technical education programs, adult literacy programs, and workforce development functions from the Department of Education to the Department of Labor. The Secretary of Labor will assume control of the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act, Title II of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, and related adult education initiatives, along with their budgets and staff. The bill is framed as reducing bureaucracy by consolidating workforce programs under a single department.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a straightforward transfer of functions and appropriations from one federal department to another. It is not a deregulation, subsidy, or carve-out, but rather a structural reorganization of existing programs under a different administrative home.
What the text implies
- Removal of education-sector expertise from workforce policy design: the Department of Education's Assistant Secretary for Career, Technical, and Adult Education has historically bridged K–12, postsecondary, and workforce systems; moving these functions to Labor may sever that integration and reduce input from educators on program design.
- Potential for reduced accountability to education committees: Congress's House Committee on Education and Workforce and Senate HELP Committee will lose direct jurisdiction over these programs; Labor-focused committees may prioritize employment metrics over educational quality or equity outcomes.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who it affects
The consolidation may improve coordination between education and employment services, potentially benefiting workers seeking career pathways. However, the transfer creates organizational disruption risk, may fragment oversight (removing education expertise from workforce policy), and the bill contains no safeguards ensuring program quality, funding levels, or accessibility are maintained during and after the transition.