QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Labor Department gets teeth to enforce mental health coverage equality

H.R. 9551 — Mental Health Parity Enforcement and Funding Act · Filed by Thomas Kean (R-NJ) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jun 30, 2026 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Consumer Protection Enforcement

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill adds civil monetary penalties as an enforcement tool for violations of mental health parity requirements under federal law. It amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) to allow the Department of Labor to fine group health plans, service providers, and plan administrators that fail to provide equal coverage for mental health and substance use disorder benefits compared to medical/surgical benefits. It also appropriates $30 million annually through 2031 to the Employee Benefits Security Administration to enforce these requirements.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is to add a civil penalty tool and enforcement funding to an existing consumer protection mandate (mental health parity). It does not create new rights; it strengthens the enforcement of existing ones by making violations costly to health plans.

What the text implies

  • The one-year implementation delay (effective for plan years beginning 1+ year after enactment) gives health plans time to audit and adjust benefit designs, but may also allow some plans to delay compliance if they anticipate regulatory uncertainty.
  • The bill expands enforcement authority to 'service providers' and 'plan administrators' in addition to plan sponsors, potentially creating liability for third-party administrators and consultants who design or manage benefit structures — a shift that may increase compliance costs across the benefits administration industry.

The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Employee Benefits Security Administration (increased enforcement budget); Workers and families with group health coverage (stronger parity protections)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record