QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress moves to crack down on wage theft with stronger penalties and worker recovery tools

H.R. 9458 — Wage Theft Prevention and Wage Recovery Act · Filed by Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) · 26 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 25, 2026 · Referred to committee

82%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
12/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Worker Protection and Wage Enforcement

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill strengthens federal wage theft protections by requiring employers to provide detailed paystubs and final payments within 14 days of termination, establishing a federal right to full compensation at agreed-upon rates, increasing civil and criminal penalties for wage violations, extending the statute of limitations for wage theft claims from 2–3 years to 4–5 years, and creating a grant program for nonprofits and state agencies to partner with the Department of Labor in investigating wage theft and educating workers about their rights.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is strengthening wage protections and enforcement: it mandates employer disclosures, increases penalties, extends statutes of limitations, and funds community enforcement partnerships. These are direct worker-protection measures, not deregulation or corporate carve-outs.

What the text implies

  • Mandatory arbitration waivers: the bill explicitly prohibits predispute arbitration agreements that waive the right to court action, overriding the Federal Arbitration Act for wage claims—a significant shift in dispute resolution that may increase litigation volume.
  • Rebuttable presumption for incomplete records: if an employer fails to keep complete wage records, the employee's testimony alone creates a presumption of accuracy that the employer must rebut with precise evidence—a substantial evidentiary burden shift.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

low-wage workers and wage theft victims (primary beneficiaries—recovery of stolen wages); nonprofit legal aid organizations and labor organizations (grant recipients for enforcement partners; state departments of labor and attorneys general (grant recipients for enforcement)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record