Congress strips states of power to require gun liability insurance
H.R. 943 — No User Fees for Gun Owners Act · Filed by Ronny Jackson (R-TX) · 51 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 4, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits states and local governments from requiring liability insurance, special taxes, or user fees as a condition of owning, buying, or selling firearms and ammunition. General sales taxes that apply equally to all goods remain permitted. The bill amends federal law to preempt state and local firearm-specific financial requirements.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is to remove state and local financial barriers (insurance, taxes, user fees) to firearm ownership and commerce. It is a preemption statute that strips subnational regulatory authority over firearm-specific charges, functionally deregulating firearm commerce at the state/local level.
What the text implies
- States that have enacted firearm liability insurance requirements (e.g., as a condition of purchase or ownership) would be preempted and unable to enforce them, eliminating a mechanism some states use to incentivize safe storage or transfer practices.
- The bill permits 'generally applicable sales taxes' but prohibits firearm-specific taxes or fees, creating a federal floor that prevents states from using differential taxation as a public-health or revenue tool.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
firearm manufacturers and retailers; ammunition manufacturers and retailers; gun owners (reduced transaction costs)