QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Hospitals must post cash prices on walls—but loopholes may limit savings

H.R. 9390 — Prices on the Wall Act of 2026 · Filed by Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jun 23, 2026 · Reported out

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Healthcare Price Transparency Mandate

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers, laboratories, and imaging providers to post prices for common, schedulable medical services on their walls starting January 1, 2028. Prices must show either the discounted cash price (what an uninsured patient pays out-of-pocket) or, if unavailable, the median price charged to self-pay patients over the previous three years, displayed as dollar amounts in patient-accessible areas.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a straightforward regulatory requirement: mandate public posting of cash prices for shoppable medical services. It is a transparency-focused consumer protection measure, not a subsidy, carve-out, or deregulation.

What the text implies

  • Hospitals and providers may respond by raising posted cash prices or narrowing the definition of 'shoppable services' to minimize price exposure, potentially offsetting transparency gains.
  • Self-pay patients may face pressure to negotiate or may discover they pay higher rates than insured patients, creating tension between transparency and equity.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who it affects

Price transparency enables uninsured and self-pay patients to comparison-shop and make informed decisions about where to receive care, potentially reducing out-of-pocket costs and exposing price variation. The requirement imposes compliance costs on providers but does not restrict patient rights, reduce coverage, or create new barriers to care.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record