Hospitals must post cash prices on walls—but loopholes may limit savings
H.R. 9390 — Prices on the Wall Act of 2026 · Filed by Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jun 23, 2026 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers, laboratories, and imaging providers to post prices for common, schedulable medical services on their walls starting January 1, 2028. Prices must show either the discounted cash price (what an uninsured patient pays out-of-pocket) or, if unavailable, the median price charged to self-pay patients over the previous three years, displayed as dollar amounts in patient-accessible areas.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a straightforward regulatory requirement: mandate public posting of cash prices for shoppable medical services. It is a transparency-focused consumer protection measure, not a subsidy, carve-out, or deregulation.
What the text implies
- Hospitals and providers may respond by raising posted cash prices or narrowing the definition of 'shoppable services' to minimize price exposure, potentially offsetting transparency gains.
- Self-pay patients may face pressure to negotiate or may discover they pay higher rates than insured patients, creating tension between transparency and equity.
- Compliance costs (signage, staff training, price updates) may be passed to patients or insurers, with unclear net savings.
- The bill does not mandate online price posting or standardized formats, limiting accessibility for patients unable to visit facilities in person.
- Providers may use the 'median cash price' fallback (when discounted cash price unavailable) to post historical rather than current rates, reducing real-time accuracy.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Price transparency enables uninsured and self-pay patients to comparison-shop and make informed decisions about where to receive care, potentially reducing out-of-pocket costs and exposing price variation. The requirement imposes compliance costs on providers but does not restrict patient rights, reduce coverage, or create new barriers to care.
Named in the bill
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Hospitals, Ambulatory surgical centers, Clinical laboratories, Imaging service providers, Self-pay patients, Uninsured individuals
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Republicans.
- Jun 23, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jun 23, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce”
- Jun 25, 2026 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
- Jul 21, 2026 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 24 - 21”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
16 lobbying clients named this bill on 16 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $2,398,750 in lobbying spend. A filing names 7 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 95% of bills with at least one filing.
Mariannette Miller-Meeks, the sponsor, reported $2,407,952 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Federation of American Hospitals — $710,000 on 1 filing
- Hca Healthcare, Inc. — $610,000 on 1 filing
- Sidecar Health, Inc — $235,000 on 1 filing
- Nemours Foundation - a Florida Not-for-profit Corporation — $140,000 on 1 filing
- New York and Presbyterian Hospital — $130,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (3,260 characters) on Jul 2, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Hospitals must post cash prices on walls—but loopholes may limit savings” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr9390 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.