QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress creates security commission, but won't enforce its findings

H.R. 9386 — United States Commission on an Open Society with Security Act of 2026 · Filed by Eleanor Norton (D-DC) · Introduced Jun 22, 2026 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Advisory Commission on Security Policy

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a 21-member federal commission to study how the U.S. government can balance public safety and counterterrorism with open access to federal buildings and public spaces. The commission will examine security practices, building design, technology, and constitutional rights, then report recommendations to the President within two years. It is funded at $5 million per year for two years.

Why we flagged it

The bill establishes a temporary, bipartisan advisory body tasked with studying the balance between public access and security in federal facilities. It is a fact-finding and recommendation mechanism, not a regulatory or appropriations instrument.

What the text implies

  • The commission's composition is heavily weighted toward presidential appointment (9 of 21 members), giving the sitting president significant influence over the final recommendations on security policy.
  • The 2-year timeline and 90-day post-report termination means the commission will dissolve before Congress acts on recommendations, reducing accountability for implementation.
  • No requirement for public hearings or transparency in commission deliberations, despite the public nature of the subject matter (federal building access).
  • The bill does not specify how conflicting recommendations (e.g., security vs. civil liberties) will be resolved or weighted in the final report.

Who it affects

The commission addresses a genuine civic tension—security vs. open democratic access—and includes diverse expertise (civil libertarians, architects, philosophers, security experts). However, the bill is purely advisory with no enforcement mechanism, and the outcome depends entirely on presidential and congressional action on recommendations. Citizens may benefit from thoughtful policy recommendations, but the commission itself creates no binding protections or changes.

Who stands to gain

  • security technology companies
  • architectural and engineering firms
  • building design consultants

Named in the bill

House Committee on Homeland Security, President of the United States, Speaker of the House, Senate Majority and Minority Leaders, General Services Administration, Federal agencies (unspecified)

Where it stands

  • Jun 22, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Jun 22, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Homeland Security and House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland…”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Jul 2, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Congress creates security commission, but won't enforce its findings” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr9386 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.