New AI safety center has no teeth—companies can ignore its standards
H.R. 9363 — AI Security and Innovation Act · Filed by Jay Obernolte (R-CA) · 7 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 18, 2026 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill establishes a new Center for AI Security and Innovation within the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to evaluate risks from artificial intelligence systems, develop voluntary security standards, and assess U.S. competitive position against foreign adversaries. The Center will work with AI developers on a voluntary basis to test frontier AI systems for national security and economic risks, but has no regulatory or enforcement power—it is purely advisory and research-focused.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is establishing a non-regulatory research center within NIST to develop voluntary AI security standards and conduct risk assessments. It is explicitly prohibited from having enforcement or rulemaking authority, making it a research and advisory body rather than a regulatory one.
What the text implies
- The confidentiality shield (Section 5304(g)) prevents federal, state, local, or tribal regulators from using information shared with the Center to regulate AI companies—effectively creating a safe harbor for companies that voluntarily participate in Center evaluations.
- The 'voluntary adoption' framework means AI developers can ignore standards and best practices with no consequence; the Center can only assess whether they are adopting them, not compel adoption.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
AI development companies (voluntary participation in testing and standards-setting without regulator; Large AI model developers (covered frontier system evaluators gain early access to security guidance