Congress locks in rural USDA offices, blocking consolidation.
H.R. 9346 — USDA Field Office Stability Act · Filed by Sharice Davids (D-KS) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 18, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits the USDA Secretary from closing or relocating county and field offices of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, Farm Service Agency, Rural Development, and county service centers, with narrow exceptions for offices within 20 miles of another office (unless in a different state) or routine relocations within the same county. It also requires the Secretary to maintain minimum staffing levels to keep all such centers open during standard business hours. The primary beneficiaries are rural communities and farmers who depend on local USDA services.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a straightforward prohibition on office closures and relocations, coupled with a staffing mandate. It is a protective measure for rural infrastructure, not a deregulation, subsidy, or carve-out.
What the text implies
- Prevents USDA consolidation strategies that might reduce administrative overhead or improve efficiency in densely served areas, potentially locking in higher operational costs.
- May constrain the Secretary's ability to respond to demographic shifts (population decline in some rural counties) by maintaining offices in areas with declining service demand.
The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Rural citizens and farmers gain guaranteed local access to USDA services (conservation, farm credit, rural development) without forced travel to distant offices. The bill protects a public service infrastructure that serves dispersed populations who would otherwise face significant access barriers.