Congress orders study on AI for the power grid—no rules yet.
H.R. 9339 — Affordable Innovation for the Grid Act · Filed by Diana Harshbarger (R-TN) · 6 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 18, 2026 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Department of Energy to study how artificial intelligence and high-performance computing could improve the nation's electrical grid—specifically its capacity, reliability, and efficiency. Within 90 days, DOE must assess current AI/computing use in grid operations, barriers to adoption (technical, regulatory, cybersecurity), and whether AI could speed up the process of connecting new generators and loads. DOE must report findings and recommendations to Congress within one year.
Why we flagged it
The bill is a straightforward fact-finding mandate requiring DOE to assess AI and high-performance computing applications in bulk-power system operations. It is neither a regulatory change nor a spending authorization—purely an information-gathering exercise with public reporting.
What the text implies
- Assessment findings may inform future deregulation or regulatory streamlining of AI/computing adoption in grid operations, potentially reducing compliance burden on utilities.
- Report recommendations could influence DOE and FERC rulemaking on grid modernization, affecting utility capital investment priorities and technology vendor selection.
- Probabilistic operating techniques assessment may signal DOE interest in risk-based grid management, which could reshape reliability standards and operational practices.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill creates a fact-finding mandate with no direct costs to citizens and produces public information about grid modernization opportunities. A transparent assessment of AI/computing adoption barriers and potential benefits informs future policy and may lead to grid improvements that lower costs and improve reliability.
Who stands to gain
- AI and high-performance computing vendors serving energy sector
- Utilities investing in grid modernization technology
- Grid software and analytics companies
Named in the bill
Department of Energy, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), Electric Reliability Organization (ERO), House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, bulk-power system, Federal Power Act Section 215
Where it stands
6 cosponsors: 3 Democrats, 3 Republicans.
- Jun 18, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jun 18, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce and Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy”
- Jun 24, 2026 — Markup held in committee · Congress.gov: “Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held”
- Jul 21, 2026 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 44 - 0”
- Sep 15, 2026 — Passed the House · Congress.gov: “On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote”
- Sep 15, 2026 — Floor vote scheduled · Congress.gov: “Mr. Guthrie moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
12 lobbying clients named this bill on 12 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $9,069,193 in lobbying spend. A filing names 47 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 93% of bills with at least one filing.
Diana Harshbarger, the sponsor, reported $727,520 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- American Petroleum Institute — $2,780,000 on 1 filing
- Duke Energy Corporation — $2,280,000 on 1 filing
- Edison Electric Institute — $1,689,193 on 1 filing
- Information Technology Industry Council — $720,000 on 1 filing
- American Electric Power Company, Inc. and Affiliated Corporations — $380,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 22, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (2,150 characters) on Jul 2, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 22, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress orders study on AI for the power grid—no rules yet.” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr9339 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.