Texas coastal conservation plan protects private property, expands public access
H.R. 9325 — Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area Act · Filed by Randy Weber (R-TX) · 6 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 15, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill establishes the Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area in Texas, a network of voluntary coastal conservation sites managed through a public-private partnership. The National Park Service will coordinate with local governments, private landowners, and nonprofits to protect and interpret coastal resources—but only from willing participants, with no federal land seizure allowed and no new regulations imposed on private property owners.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is establishing a cooperative management framework for coastal sites in Texas, with explicit protections for private property and state sovereignty. It is fundamentally a coordination and partnership statute, not a regulatory or acquisition mandate.
What the text implies
- Oil and gas mineral rights are explicitly preserved and protected—operators can reserve minerals and access surface land for extraction, potentially limiting conservation outcomes in practice.
- The bill exempts the National Recreation Area from Clean Air Act Class I designation, which may reduce air-quality protections in the coastal zone.
- Federal emergency response authority (FEMA, hurricane relief) is explicitly preserved and unaffected, ensuring disaster funding flows regardless of conservation status.
- The 25% federal cost-share cap on cooperative projects (with 3:1 non-federal match requirement) may limit federal investment and shift financial burden to state/local/private partners.
Who it affects
Ordinary citizens gain expanded public access to coastal recreation and conservation without bearing regulatory burden. The bill explicitly protects private property rights, prohibits new regulations on landowners, and ensures state/local control. Participation is entirely voluntary, and the partnership model distributes management authority rather than concentrating it federally.
Who stands to gain
- oil and gas operators (mineral rights preservation)
- tourism and recreation businesses (public access expansion)
- coastal real estate and development interests (property-rights protections)
Named in the bill
National Park Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Texas Historical Commission, Lone Star Coastal Alliance, Galveston County, Brazoria County, Matagorda County, Chambers County, Jefferson County, Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary, Galveston Bay — and 1 more
Where it stands
6 cosponsors: 5 Republicans, 1 Democrats.
- Jun 15, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jun 15, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Jul 9, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Texas coastal conservation plan protects private property, expands public access” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr9325 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.