QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress demands DHS reveal its surveillance arsenal before expanding it

H.R. 9314 — DHS Surveillance Technology Moratorium Act of 2026 · Filed by Dan Goldman (D-NY) · 8 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 15, 2026 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Surveillance Oversight & Transparency…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill pauses new Department of Homeland Security contracts for surveillance technologies used in immigration enforcement—including facial recognition, location tracking, and predictive analytics—until DHS completes a public audit of what data it collects, who it collects from, and how it uses the information. The pause does not terminate existing contracts, but blocks new ones and renewals unless the Secretary certifies an imminent threat or national security emergency. After the audit and a 90-day review period, DHS must publish a detailed public report on all surveillance tools, contractors, data sources, and safeguards before the moratorium ends.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to impose a temporary moratorium on new DHS surveillance contracts and mandate comprehensive public disclosure of existing surveillance capabilities, data practices, and contractor relationships. It is fundamentally a transparency and accountability mechanism, not a deregulation or subsidy.

What the text implies

  • The 90-day post-audit review period before moratorium termination may create a de facto extended pause if Congress objects to DHS safeguard proposals, effectively giving Congress veto power over surveillance expansion.
  • Annual reporting requirements after moratorium ends establish a permanent transparency baseline that could constrain future DHS surveillance procurement decisions through public scrutiny.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who it affects

Ordinary citizens gain transparency and oversight of surveillance systems that directly affect immigration enforcement and potentially broader law enforcement. The mandatory public audit, contractor disclosure, and annual reporting create accountability mechanisms that did not previously exist.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record