Federal workers gain paid leave for family care and domestic violence—with strings attached.
H.R. 9261 — Comprehensive Paid Leave for Federal Employees Act · Filed by Donald Beyer (D-VA) · 16 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 11, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill expands paid family and medical leave for federal employees, congressional staff, and certain other government workers. It increases paid leave from 12 to 12 weeks (with additional accrued leave available), adds new reasons to use leave including recovery from pregnancy loss, surrogacy, and domestic violence, and requires employees to commit to working for their agency for a period equal to the leave taken or repay the government's health insurance contributions during that leave.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a straightforward expansion of paid leave entitlements for federal workers, adding new qualifying events (domestic violence, pregnancy loss, surrogacy) and increasing the paid-leave period. It is not a deregulation, tax carve-out, or private subsidy—it is a direct benefit to a defined public workforce.
What the text implies
- Repayment obligation may deter federal employees from leaving employment after taking leave, potentially reducing labor mobility and creating a form of indentured service for those who use the benefit.
- Work-obligation requirement applies only to paid leave under subparagraphs (A) and (B) (birth/adoption/family care), not to domestic-violence leave (F), creating an asymmetry in enforcement burden.
- Agencies may recover health-insurance contributions from departing employees, which could exceed the actual cost of leave and function as a penalty rather than cost recovery.
- Definition of 'family member' is broad and includes domestic partners and relatives by affinity, expanding leave eligibility beyond traditional nuclear-family definitions.
- Domestic-violence leave provision (6382(a)(1)(F)) is comprehensive but certification requirements and agency discretion in enforcement may create barriers to access for vulnerable employees.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Federal employees and their families gain access to paid leave for family care, medical recovery, and domestic-violence support—protections that reduce financial hardship during vulnerable periods. The work-obligation requirement and repayment clause create a cost to employees who leave, but this is a reasonable condition tied to a genuine public benefit (paid leave funded by taxpayers), not a hidden restriction on rights.
Named in the bill
Federal employees (5 U.S.C. § 2105), United States Postal Service, Postal Regulatory Commission, Congressional staff (Congressional Accountability Act of 1995), Government Accountability Office, Library of Congress, Executive Office of the President, FAA and TSA employees, Veterans Affairs employees (38 U.S.C. § 7425), District of Columbia courts, District of Columbia public defender service, Office of Personnel Management (OPM)
Where it stands
16 cosponsors: 15 Democrats, 1 Republicans.
- Jun 11, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jun 11, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on House Administration and House Committee on Veterans' Affairs · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on Veterans'…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
3 lobbying clients named this bill on 3 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $20,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 32 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 61% of bills with at least one filing.
Donald Beyer, the sponsor, reported $633,099 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- National Council of Jewish Women — $10,000 on 1 filing
- Reproductive Freedom for All — $10,000 on 1 filing
- Federal Managers Association — $0 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (20,500 characters) on Sep 7, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Federal workers gain paid leave for family care and domestic violence—with strings attached.” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr9261 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.