Congress gives indie musicians legal right to bargain collectively against Spotify
H.R. 9253 — Protect Working Musicians Act of 2026 · Filed by Deborah Ross (D-NC) · 7 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 10, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a legal safe harbor allowing independent music creators and songwriters (those earning under $1 million annually or qualifying as small businesses) to collectively negotiate licensing terms with dominant streaming platforms and AI companies without violating antitrust law. It addresses a power imbalance where platforms like Spotify and Apple Music can dictate take-it-or-leave-it terms to individual creators, who lack resources to negotiate alone.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a narrow antitrust exemption—a safe harbor—that permits otherwise-prohibited collective action (joint negotiation and refusal to license) by a defined class of creators. It is not a subsidy, regulation, or direct government intervention, but rather a legal shield for private parties to coordinate.
What the text implies
- The safe harbor applies to negotiations with 'companies engaged in development or deployment of generative artificial intelligence'—a broad category that may extend collective bargaining rights beyond music platforms to AI training companies, with unclear scope and potential for disputes over what constitutes 'deployment.'
- The $1 million revenue threshold and NAICS code definitions determine who qualifies as an 'Individual Music Creator Owner.' Creators just above the threshold or in adjacent classifications are excluded, creating a sharp eligibility cliff that may incentivize income-splitting or entity restructuring.
- The bill does not address how collective negotiations would be organized, funded, or enforced—no mention of union formation, representative structures, or dispute resolution. Implementation details critical to effectiveness are absent.
- Platforms retain the right to refuse licensing entirely or delist creators who participate in collective action, provided they do so uniformly. The safe harbor does not guarantee access to distribution, only the right to negotiate without antitrust liability.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Independent musicians and songwriters gain a legal right to collective bargaining against platforms with vastly superior market power, potentially improving their ability to earn fair compensation for their work. The safe harbor is narrowly tailored—limited to price and non-discriminatory terms, excluding non-creators—and does not shield anti-competitive conduct beyond collective negotiation.
Who stands to gain
- independent musicians and songwriters (under $1M annual licensing revenue)
- small music production entities (NAICS 512230, 512250)
Named in the bill
Dominant Online Music Distribution Platforms, Spotify, Apple Music, generative artificial intelligence companies, Independent Music Creator Owners, Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), Clayton Act, Federal Trade Commission Act, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), NAICS codes 512230, 512250
Where it stands
7 cosponsors: 7 Democrats.
- Jun 10, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jun 10, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $140,778 in lobbying spend. A filing names 10 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Deborah Ross, the sponsor, reported $735,079 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Recording Academy — $120,778 on 1 filing
- American Association of Independent Music — $20,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (7,238 characters) on Aug 19, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress gives indie musicians legal right to bargain collectively against Spotify” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr9253 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.