QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress funds national park repairs with energy royalties and foreign visitor fees

H.R. 9250 — Great American Outdoors Act 250 · Filed by Bruce Westerman (R-AR) · 251 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 10, 2026 · Reported out

78%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Public Lands Maintenance & Modernization

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill renames and expands the National Parks and Public Land Legacy Restoration Fund to the 'America's Legacy Restoration Fund' and dedicates it to fixing deferred maintenance (delayed repairs) at national parks, forests, wildlife refuges, and public lands. It funds this through energy development revenues on federal land (50% of oil, gas, coal, and renewable energy royalties), donations, and new entrance fees for foreign visitors ($100+ per visit, $250 for annual pass). The fund allocates money to five agencies (70% to National Park Service, 15% to Forest Service, 5% each to Fish & Wildlife, Bureau of Land Management, and Bureau of Indian Education) for repairs, modernization, and outdoor recreation projects, with strict transparency requirements and congressional oversight.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a dedicated revenue stream and fund allocation for deferred maintenance across five federal land-management agencies. It is a straightforward infrastructure and stewardship bill, not a tax carve-out, subsidy, or deregulation.

What the text implies

  • The 50% energy development revenue deposit may create a structural incentive for Interior to approve oil, gas, and coal leases to maximize fund deposits, potentially conflicting with conservation goals.
  • The $1.9 billion annual cap on fund deposits (with excess going to General Fund) may leave significant deferred maintenance unfunded in high-cost years, limiting the bill's stated purpose.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

construction and engineering contractors; nonprofit conservation organizations (National Park Foundation, National Forest Foundation, etc.); outdoor recreation and tourism operators

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record