Congress locks down U.S. seaports against drone attacks—with narrow exceptions.
H.R. 9229 — Seaport Security Act of 2026 · Filed by Jimmy Patronis (R-FL) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 9, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a federal ban on operating drones over U.S. seaports without authorization, establishing a 1,000-foot no-fly zone above seaports that handle at least 1 million tons of cargo annually or process multi-day cruise passengers. It allows exceptions for federal agencies, state/local law enforcement, seaport operators, and emergency responders, with civil penalties up to $25,000 and criminal penalties up to 10 years imprisonment for violations intended to facilitate terrorism or criminal activity.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is straightforward: it establishes a regulatory no-fly zone over seaports to prevent drone-based attacks or interference. This is a direct security restriction on a specific threat vector, not a subsidy, deregulation, or private carve-out.
What the text implies
- The definition of 'seaport' (1+ million tons cargo annually or multi-day cruise passengers) may exclude smaller regional ports, creating a two-tier security regime where some maritime facilities lack federal drone restrictions.
- The Administrator's authority to designate 'additional lateral or vertical airspace' beyond 1,000 feet is discretionary and may expand the no-fly zone without further congressional action, potentially affecting commercial drone operations in adjacent areas.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
drone detection and mitigation technology vendors; seaport security contractors; maritime security consulting firms