Federal wildlife agency must now weigh state data in species protection decisions
H.R. 9184 — Local Data for Better Conservation Act · Filed by Lauren Boebert (R-CO) · 6 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 8, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Endangered Species Act to require the federal government to accept and integrate state-collected data when deciding whether to list or delist species as endangered or threatened. It does not mandate that states collect data or that federal decisions follow state recommendations, only that state data be considered and incorporated into federal listing determinations.
Why we flagged it
The bill is a narrow procedural change to the Endangered Species Act's listing process, requiring federal consideration of state data without altering the Secretary's ultimate authority or the substantive criteria for listing decisions.
What the text implies
- No standard is set for how state data must be weighted relative to federal data, creating discretion that could allow state economic interests to influence federal conservation decisions without transparency.
- States with extractive industries (timber, mining, oil/gas) may systematically provide data downplaying species risk, and the bill does not require disclosure of state funding sources or conflicts of interest.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
extractive industries (timber, mining, oil/gas, agriculture); real estate development; state wildlife agencies (potential funding/influence expansion)