Crypto tax dodgers get amnesty—but only if they can afford good lawyers
H.R. 9174 — Digital Assets Voluntary Disclosure Program Act · Filed by Aaron Bean (R-FL) · Introduced Jun 8, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a voluntary disclosure program allowing taxpayers who failed to report income or pay taxes on digital assets (cryptocurrency, etc.) to come forward, pay back taxes plus penalties, and avoid criminal prosecution. Taxpayers who certify their violations were not fraudulent face much lower penalties (5–10%) than those who cannot make that certification (25–40%), and both groups get immunity from criminal investigation for disclosed violations.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to establish a voluntary disclosure amnesty for digital asset tax violations, allowing taxpayers to remediate past non-compliance in exchange for back taxes, penalties, and immunity from criminal prosecution. This is a standard tax administration mechanism, not a substantive policy change.
What the text implies
- The two-tier penalty structure (25–40% for uncertified vs. 0–5% for certified taxpayers) may disproportionately benefit high-income or sophisticated taxpayers who can credibly claim non-fraudulent intent, while less-educated or lower-income taxpayers face steeper penalties for the same underlying violation.
- The 6-year lookback for uncertified taxpayers vs. 3-year for certified taxpayers creates an incentive to claim non-fraudulent status, potentially allowing taxpayers to avoid disclosure of older violations if they can certify current compliance.
- The Secretary's broad discretion to waive penalties 'in the interests of justice' is undefined and may create inconsistent enforcement or opportunities for selective application.
- Criminal immunity is limited to sections 7201, 7203, and 7206 (tax evasion, failure to file, fraud); it does not extend to money laundering, structuring, or other financial crimes that may be associated with digital asset concealment.
Who it affects
The program offers a genuine public benefit by incentivizing voluntary compliance and reducing tax evasion, while also providing a safety valve for taxpayers to resolve past violations without criminal jeopardy. However, it creates a two-tier system where wealthier or more sophisticated taxpayers (those able to certify non-fraudulent intent) receive substantially lower penalties, potentially rewarding those who can afford better tax advice or claim plausible deniability, while less sophisticated
Who stands to gain
- cryptocurrency holders and traders
- tax advisory and accounting firms specializing in digital assets
- high-net-worth individuals with unreported digital asset income
Named in the bill
Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Secretary of the Treasury, Digital assets (cryptocurrency), Section 6159 (installment agreements), Section 6662 (accuracy-related penalties), Section 6663 (fraud penalties), Section 7201 (tax evasion), Section 7203 (willful failure to file), Section 7206 (fraud and false statements)
Where it stands
- Jun 8, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jun 8, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
6 lobbying clients named this bill on 6 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $6,200,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 13 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 82% of bills with at least one filing.
Aaron Bean, the sponsor, reported $1,227,650 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- American Bankers Association — $3,510,000 on 1 filing
- Coinbase, Inc. — $1,160,000 on 1 filing
- Solana Policy Institute — $610,000 on 1 filing
- Blockchain Association — $320,000 on 1 filing
- Crypto Council for Innovation — $310,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Jun 10, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Crypto tax dodgers get amnesty—but only if they can afford good lawyers” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr9174 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.