QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence
Full Simple

Bill expands national security screening to biotech deals.

H.R. 9102 — BINSA Act · Filed by John Moolenaar (R-MI) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jun 2, 2026 · Referred to committee

62%
How clear the bill is
Typical bill: 82%
35/100
Chance of hidden extras
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernNational Security Investment Screening…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

The bill treats biotechnology as a national security technology. Four agencies must decide which biotech deals get reported or stopped. These agencies are Treasury, Defense, Health and Human Services, and Intelligence. The bill aims to prevent U.S. money and intellectual property from going to Chinese biotech firms. It covers licensing, joint ventures, and equity investments.

Who it affects

Biotech companies, pharmaceutical firms, and clinical research organizations may face new rules. U.S. biotech companies may find it harder to partner with foreign firms. Patients could see delays or higher costs for new drugs.

One thing to notice

The bill gives four agencies broad power to block or report biotech deals. The bill does not set clear limits on that power. The bill does not define strategic dependency risk.

From the analysis of the bill text, linked under Primary records below.

Where it stands

1 cosponsor: 1 Democrats.

  • Jun 2, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Jun 2, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Financial Services · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

Money around this bill

13 groups reported lobbying about this bill. They filed 13 reports from Jun 2026 to Jun 2026.

Those reports show $18,610,000 in lobbying spending. Each report lists about 19 bills. So that money was not all for this bill.

More groups named this bill than 94% of bills with any report.

John Moolenaar, who sponsored the bill, received $565,100 from PACs for the 2026 election.

  • Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America — $7,360,000 in 1 report
  • Amgen Inc — $2,440,000 in 1 report
  • Biotechnology Innovation Organization — $2,360,000 in 1 report
  • Pfizer Inc. — $1,880,000 in 1 report
  • Novartis — $1,410,000 in 1 report

Lobbying is legal. These reports show who lobbied about this bill, not what changed.

Words to know

  • biotechnology — Science of using living things to make medicines, drugs, and treatments.
  • intellectual property — Creations of the mind, like inventions and discoveries a company owns.
  • equity investments — Money put into a company in exchange for partial ownership.
  • joint ventures — Business partnerships where two or more companies work together.
  • lobbying — Trying to influence lawmakers about a bill. Companies and groups pay people to do this.
  • PACs — Groups that collect money and give it to candidates for office.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (6,597 characters) on Aug 20, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 14,206 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.

As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-09-17.

“Bill expands national security screening to biotech deals.” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr9102/simple Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record