Congress bans Chinese-connected brokers from U.S. markets—no case-by-case review
H.R. 9028 — PRC Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers Moratorium Act · Filed by Michael Lawler (R-NY) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced May 26, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits brokers, dealers, and investment advisers with certain connections to China from registering with the SEC. It bars registration for firms organized in China, controlled by Chinese entities or nationals, or that use Chinese-affiliated companies for critical services like platform infrastructure, software development, or customer support. The ban expires after 5 years unless Congress extends it.
Why we flagged it
The bill functions as a categorical exclusion from SEC registration based on foreign ownership and control thresholds, framed as national security but operating as a blanket sectoral moratorium on Chinese-connected financial firms.
What the text implies
- The 15% control threshold is unusually low and may capture minority-stake investors, joint ventures, and legitimate cross-border partnerships, not just hostile takeovers or espionage vectors.
- The ban on 'associated persons' providing 'platform infrastructure' or 'software support' is vague and could be interpreted to exclude firms using any Chinese-origin cloud services, open-source software, or outsourced IT—a much broader net than foreign ownership.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
U.S. brokers and dealers (reduced competition from Chinese-affiliated firms); U.S. investment advisers (reduced competition, potential fee increases); Domestic financial services firms (market consolidation, reduced price pressure)