QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress orders military to study hazing as standalone crime

H.R. 9024 — Harry Lew and Danny Chen Military Justice Reform Act · Filed by Judy Chu (D-CA) · 18 cosponsors · Introduced May 26, 2026 · Referred to committee

95%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
5/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Military Justice Reform Study

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill directs the Secretary of Defense to study whether the military should create a new, standalone criminal offense for hazing under military law (the Uniform Code of Military Justice). The Secretary must develop a definition of hazing and report findings to Congress within 180 days. The bill does not itself create the offense or change military law—it only requires analysis and a recommendation.

Why we flagged it

The bill is a straightforward directive for analysis and reporting on a potential military criminal law reform. It does not enact policy but mandates a feasibility study on hazing criminalization, named after two soldiers whose deaths were linked to hazing.

What the text implies

  • A formal study may create political and institutional pressure on the DoD to adopt the recommendations, even if the Secretary's analysis concludes against a separate article.
  • The 180-day timeline is tight for a comprehensive analysis involving the Joint Service Committee; rushed conclusions may lack depth or inter-service consensus.

The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.

Who it affects

Military personnel and their families gain transparency and potential protection through a formal study of hazing criminalization. The bill creates accountability by requiring the military to examine whether current law adequately addresses hazing and to propose a dedicated offense, which may deter abuse and provide clearer legal recourse for victims.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record