Congress strips Amtrak's power to force arbitration on passengers
H.R. 8888 — Ending Passenger Rail Forced Arbitration Act · Filed by Chris Deluzio (D-PA) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced May 19, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits Amtrak from forcing passengers to sign agreements that require disputes to be settled through private arbitration instead of court, and bans clauses that prevent customers from joining class-action lawsuits. It applies to consumer complaints (injuries, service issues) and civil rights disputes (discrimination based on race, sex, age, disability, etc.), ensuring passengers can sue Amtrak in court individually or as a group.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to strip Amtrak of the ability to enforce predispute arbitration agreements and class-action waivers in consumer and civil rights disputes, restoring court access and collective action rights to passengers.
What the text implies
- Amtrak may face increased litigation exposure and higher legal costs, potentially affecting operational budgets and service pricing.
- Class-action certification becomes viable for systemic issues (e.g., widespread accessibility failures, discriminatory policies), creating incentive for policy reform.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
plaintiff's attorneys / class-action law firms; consumer advocacy organizations