QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal funding for startup hubs in struggling regions gets a boost

H.R. 8866 — Build to Scale Reauthorization Act of 2026 · Filed by Haley Stevens (D-MI) · 5 cosponsors · Introduced May 15, 2026 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
5/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Regional Innovation Infrastructure…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill reauthorizes and expands the regional innovation program under the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980, which funds state and nonprofit organizations that support startup development and commercialization in economically distressed regions. The bill increases the federal cost-share cap from 50% to up to 90%, adds new eligibility criteria targeting rural and trade-impacted communities, and authorizes $50 million annually through 2030 to support venture development organizations that provide financing and entrepreneurial services to innovation-based businesses.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to reauthorize and expand an existing federal program that funds state and nonprofit organizations supporting startup development in economically distressed regions. It is a straightforward reauthorization with modest programmatic expansions and increased funding.

What the text implies

  • The increase in federal cost-share from 50% to up to 90% (with the additional 40% based on 'relative needs') creates discretionary authority for the Secretary to vary funding levels by region, potentially concentrating resources in the most distressed areas but also introducing subjectivity in allocation.
  • The mandate to conduct outreach to 'communities negatively impacted by trade' signals a policy response to trade-related job losses, but the bill does not specify metrics for measuring success or accountability for outcomes.
  • The authorization to use unobligated funds from prior fiscal years may allow the program to operate without new appropriations if prior-year balances exist, creating uncertainty about actual funding levels.
  • The expansion of 'venture development organization' definition to include direct financing and commercialization services may blur the line between federal grant-making and private venture capital, raising questions about subsidy capture and market distortion.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

The bill directs federal funding toward innovation infrastructure in economically distressed, rural, and trade-impacted communities—regions that typically lack venture capital access. By increasing the federal cost-share and mandating outreach to underserved areas, it expands opportunity for entrepreneurs and workers in communities that have been left behind by traditional venture markets.

Who stands to gain

  • State and nonprofit venture development organizations
  • Innovation-based startups and entrepreneurs in eligible regions
  • Rural and trade-impacted communities (indirect, through economic development)

Named in the bill

Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980, Section 27 (regional innovation program), Section 28 (Regional Technology and Innovation Hub Program), Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Secretary (of Commerce, implied), Venture development organizations, Workforce investment area boards

Where it stands

5 cosponsors: 3 Republicans, 2 Democrats.

  • May 15, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • May 15, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

Money around this bill

2 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $90,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 6 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.

More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.

Haley Stevens, the sponsor, reported $1,745,251 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.

  • Wayne State University — $50,000 on 1 filing
  • Ui Labs D/b/a Mxd — $40,000 on 1 filing

Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 15, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (3,487 characters) on Sep 5, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.

As of — lobbying records through Jul 15, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Federal funding for startup hubs in struggling regions gets a boost” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr8866 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.