Congress funds endangered species recovery with $20M over six years.
H.R. 8850 — Extinction Prevention Act of 2026 · Filed by Adelita Grijalva (D-AZ) · 14 cosponsors · Introduced May 15, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates four dedicated conservation funds—totaling $20 million over six years (2027–2032)—to protect endangered butterflies across North America, plants in the Pacific Islands, freshwater mussels in U.S. waters, and desert fish in the Southwest. The Secretary of the Interior will award competitive grants to states, tribes, nonprofits, and research institutions to fund habitat restoration, species monitoring, and conservation projects. Ordinary citizens benefit through ecosystem protection, species recovery, and public reporting on conservation progress.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is straightforward: it establishes four dedicated conservation funds and authorizes $5 million annually per fund for competitive grants to support endangered species recovery and habitat protection. This is routine conservation legislation with no hidden provisions or narrow beneficiaries.
What the text implies
- International coordination required for North America butterfly projects may create diplomatic dependencies on Canada and Mexico for species recovery success.
- Matching-fund preference may advantage well-resourced nonprofits and institutions over smaller grassroots organizations in rural or underserved regions.
- Secretary's discretion to waive sustainability and matching-fund criteria for 'high priority' projects creates potential for inconsistent grant allocation without explicit statutory guidance.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill directs public funds to protect endangered species and ecosystems that provide ecological services (pollination, water quality, biodiversity) benefiting all citizens. Grants are competitive and require local participation, indigenous consent where applicable, and public reporting, ensuring accountability and broad public benefit rather than private capture.
Who stands to gain
- nonprofit conservation organizations
- state and tribal wildlife agencies
- research institutions and universities
- environmental consulting firms
Named in the bill
Secretary of the Interior, U.S. Department of the Interior, State wildlife agencies, Tribal agencies, Nonprofit conservation organizations, Research institutions, Secretary of the Treasury, Endangered Species Act of 1973
Where it stands
14 cosponsors: 14 Democrats.
- May 15, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- May 15, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (45,270 characters) on Oct 31, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,778 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-31.
“Congress funds endangered species recovery with $20M over six years.” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr8850 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.