Federal education funding now tied to ideology, not merit or need.
H.R. 8705 — CHARLIE Act · Filed by Burgess Owens (R-UT) · Introduced May 7, 2026 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the federal American History and Civics education grant program to prohibit funding for what it calls 'discriminatory equity ideology' and 'gender ideology,' and bars the Department of Education from prioritizing grant awards based on race, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or immigration status. The bill defines these terms by reference to two executive orders rather than stating them directly in the statute.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is to prohibit federal education grants based on ideological content (equity and gender topics) and to restrict grant priority based on protected characteristics. It is not a straightforward funding cut or program elimination, but rather a conditional restriction tied to speech/curriculum content.
What the text implies
- The bill defines 'discriminatory equity ideology' and 'gender ideology' by reference to two executive orders (14190 and 14168) rather than stating the definitions in the statute itself. This means the scope of the prohibition is not fixed in law but depends on the executive orders' language, which is not quoted here. Schools and grant applicants cannot know with certainty what is prohibited withou
- By barring grant priority based on 'the identity or purpose of the eligible entity,' the bill may prevent the Department of Education from prioritizing grants to schools or organizations that explicitly serve historically marginalized communities (e.g., schools with majority-minority enrollment, LGBTQ+-focused civics programs, or organizations founded to address historical inequities).
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who it affects
The bill restricts federal education funding based on ideological content and protected characteristics, which may limit students' exposure to certain historical and civic perspectives and reduce resources for schools serving marginalized communities. However, the operative definitions are delegated to executive orders not quoted in the bill text, making the actual scope of the restriction unclear from this document alone — the civic impact depends entirely on how those executive orders define t