Congress expands power to block foreign land deals, reversing burden of proof
H.R. 8700 — Protecting U.S. Farmland and Sensitive Sites From Foreign Adversaries Act · Filed by John Moolenaar (R-MI) · 19 cosponsors · Introduced May 7, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill expands the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) authority to block or scrutinize real estate purchases by citizens and entities from six named countries (China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, Venezuela) — including farmland, property near military bases, airports, ports, and telecommunications infrastructure. It creates a legal presumption that such transactions pose an unresolvable national security risk unless CFIUS proves otherwise by 'clear and convincing evidence,' and requires the Secretary of Agriculture to participate in all agriculture-related reviews.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a presumption-based veto power over real estate transactions by foreign nationals from adversary nations, enforced through expanded CFIUS jurisdiction and heightened evidentiary burdens on the foreign party.
What the text implies
- The 'clear and convincing evidence' standard reverses the normal burden of proof in administrative law, requiring CFIUS to affirmatively prove a transaction is safe rather than the foreign party proving it is not a risk — a significant shift in due process.
- The definition of 'sensitive site' is extremely broad and includes any facility 'determined by the SecDef or SecDHS,' creating an open-ended category that could expand indefinitely without legislative amendment.
- State authority preservation (Section 7) allows states to impose their own foreign land restrictions, potentially creating a patchwork of conflicting rules and enabling discriminatory state-level policies against specific nationalities.
- The bill does not establish a timeline for CFIUS review or decision, potentially leaving foreign investors in indefinite limbo and creating leverage for forced divestment or unfavorable terms.
- Agricultural biotechnology is explicitly covered, giving CFIUS veto power over foreign investment in seed companies, genetic research, and food-production technology — sectors with significant private-sector participation and intellectual property value.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill strengthens national security oversight of foreign land acquisition near sensitive U.S. sites, which protects citizens from potential espionage or hostile control of critical infrastructure. However, it creates a presumption of guilt for foreign investors that reverses normal legal burdens and may chill legitimate foreign investment, raise property values for domestic owners, and expand government power to block transactions with minimal transparency or appeal rights.
Who stands to gain
- domestic agricultural landowners (property value protection)
- U.S. defense contractors and infrastructure operators (reduced foreign competition for sensitive-sit
- domestic real estate investors (reduced foreign competition for farmland and strategic properties)
Named in the bill
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), Secretary of Defense, Secretary of Homeland Security, Secretary of Agriculture, People's Republic of China, Russian Federation, Islamic Republic of Iran, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Cuba, Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Defense Production Act of 1950, Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act of 1978 — and 3 more
Where it stands
19 cosponsors: 15 Republicans, 4 Democrats.
- May 7, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- May 7, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce and House Committee on Foreign Affairs · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees on Foreign Affairs, and…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $270,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 50 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
John Moolenaar, the sponsor, reported $595,100 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Fdd Action — $240,000 on 1 filing
- Commuter Rail Coalition — $30,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (10,317 characters) on Aug 14, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress expands power to block foreign land deals, reversing burden of proof” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr8700 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.