QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress expands power to block foreign land deals, reversing burden of proof

H.R. 8700 — Protecting U.S. Farmland and Sensitive Sites From Foreign Adversaries Act · Filed by John Moolenaar (R-MI) · 18 cosponsors · Introduced May 7, 2026 · Referred to committee

55%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
35/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernForeign Land Acquisition Restriction

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill expands the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) authority to block or scrutinize real estate purchases by citizens and entities from six named countries (China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, Venezuela) — including farmland, property near military bases, airports, ports, and telecommunications infrastructure. It creates a legal presumption that such transactions pose an unresolvable national security risk unless CFIUS proves otherwise by 'clear and convincing evidence,' and requires the Secretary of Agriculture to participate in all agriculture-related reviews.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a presumption-based veto power over real estate transactions by foreign nationals from adversary nations, enforced through expanded CFIUS jurisdiction and heightened evidentiary burdens on the foreign party.

What the text implies

  • The 'clear and convincing evidence' standard reverses the normal burden of proof in administrative law, requiring CFIUS to affirmatively prove a transaction is safe rather than the foreign party proving it is not a risk — a significant shift in due process.
  • The definition of 'sensitive site' is extremely broad and includes any facility 'determined by the SecDef or SecDHS,' creating an open-ended category that could expand indefinitely without legislative amendment.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

domestic agricultural landowners (property value protection); U.S. defense contractors and infrastructure operators (reduced foreign competition for sensitive-sit; domestic real estate investors (reduced foreign competition for farmland and strategic properties)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record