QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

State Dept. to Bankroll U.S. Nuclear Exports Under Nonproliferation Guise

H.R. 8648 — FORGE Act · Filed by James Baird (R-IN) · 4 cosponsors · Introduced May 4, 2026 · Referred to committee

72%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
35/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Nuclear Export Promotion & Diplomacy

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

The FORGE Act establishes a State Department program (FIRST) to promote U.S. small modular reactor technology and civil nuclear projects abroad through diplomatic engagement, regulatory consultation, and commercial development support. The program will advocate for U.S. nuclear businesses in international forums, help partner countries adopt U.S. reactor standards, and provide feasibility studies for U.S. commercial nuclear projects—effectively using taxpayer-funded diplomacy to boost U.S. nuclear exports. The program sunsets in 2034 and requires congressional briefings every four months.

Why we flagged it

The bill establishes a State Department program to promote U.S. small modular reactor (SMR) technology exports and civil nuclear projects abroad through diplomatic engagement, regulatory consultation, and commercial support. It is fundamentally an export-promotion and strategic-positioning mechanism dressed in nonproliferation language.

What the text implies

  • The FIRST program explicitly directs State Department diplomatic resources to advocate for U.S. nuclear businesses in bilateral and multilateral forums, blurring the line between foreign policy and commercial promotion. This may subordinate nonproliferation or human-rights concerns to export competitiveness.
  • The bill authorizes 'early-stage commercial project development support, including feasibility and engineering studies' funded by taxpayers, effectively subsidizing private nuclear companies' market entry in foreign markets—a form of export financing that may distort competition with state-backed competitors.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

U.S. small modular reactor (SMR) manufacturers (e.g., NuScale, X-energy, TerraPower); Nuclear engineering and consulting firms; Export-focused nuclear supply chain companies

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record