Congress proposes expanding Supreme Court from 9 to 13 justices
H.R. 8647 — Representative Green's Original Legislation to increase from 9 to 13 the number of justices of the Supreme Court. · Filed by Al Green (D-TX) · Introduced May 4, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill increases the number of Supreme Court justices from 9 to 13 by amending the statute that sets the Court's size. It changes two numbers in Title 28 of the U.S. Code: one reference from 8 to 12, and another from 6 to 8. The bill does not specify how the four new seats would be filled, by whom, or on what timeline.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole function is to change the statutory size of the Supreme Court. It is a direct amendment to the foundational statute governing the Court's composition, with no riders, appropriations, or collateral provisions.
What the text implies
- The bill does not specify how the four new seats would be filled, leaving appointment authority and timeline to future legislation or executive action — a critical gap that could enable partisan capture of the expansion process.
- Amending only the number of justices without addressing quorum, voting rules, or internal Court procedures may create operational ambiguity about how the expanded bench conducts business.
- The bill sets a precedent for changing the Court's size by simple majority vote, potentially inviting future expansions by opposing majorities in response — a cycle that could destabilize the judiciary.
- No grandfather clause or transition rule is specified; the bill does not clarify whether current justices retain their seats or whether the expansion triggers any recusal or retirement expectations.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Court expansion is a structural change with competing civic implications: it could democratize the Court by reducing the weight of any single justice's ideology and potentially restoring alignment between the Court and public opinion after decades of ideological drift, but it also sets a precedent for partisan manipulation of the Court's size and threatens judicial independence if future majorities expand the bench further in response. The bill itself contains no safeguards, timeline, or criteri
Named in the bill
Supreme Court of the United States, 28 U.S.C. § 1, House Committee on the Judiciary, Representative Green
Where it stands
- May 4, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- May 4, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (176 characters) on Sep 18, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress proposes expanding Supreme Court from 9 to 13 justices” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr8647 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.