QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal ban on abortion procedure creates private right to sue doctors

H.R. 8603 — Dismemberment Abortion Ban Act of 2026 · Filed by Kat Cammack (R-FL) · 17 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 30, 2026 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Abortion Procedure Restriction

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill makes it a federal crime for physicians to perform a specific abortion procedure called 'dismemberment abortion'—defined as using instruments like forceps or scissors to remove fetal parts piece by piece. Violators face up to 2 years in prison and fines. The bill creates a private right of action allowing women, parents of minors, and others to sue physicians for damages (including three times the abortion cost plus punitive damages), though women themselves cannot be prosecuted. The ban includes an exception only for procedures necessary to save the mother's life, and explicitly does not restrict other abortion methods.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a federal criminal prohibition on a specific abortion procedure, coupled with civil liability provisions. It is substantively a restriction on abortion access and physician conduct, not a broader regulatory or appropriations measure.

What the text implies

  • Private right of action may incentivize litigation against physicians even in cases where the procedure was medically necessary or performed in good faith, creating a chilling effect on abortion provision.
  • Definition of 'dismemberment abortion' is technical and may create ambiguity in clinical practice, potentially exposing physicians to prosecution for procedures they believed were lawful.
  • Civil damages of three times the abortion cost plus punitive damages create significant financial exposure for physicians, potentially driving them out of abortion provision entirely.
  • Immunity for women from prosecution may not prevent them from being named as defendants in civil suits or from facing social/economic consequences from disclosure.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

The bill restricts access to a specific abortion procedure and creates criminal penalties for physicians who provide it, reducing reproductive autonomy and medical options for pregnant people. While the bill shields women from prosecution, it exposes physicians to criminal liability and private civil suits, which may deter provision of the procedure and limit pregnant people's access to medical care.

Named in the bill

U.S. House of Representatives, House Committee on the Judiciary, Title 18, United States Code, Chapter 74 (Partial-birth abortions), Physicians/abortion providers

Where it stands

17 cosponsors: 17 Republicans.

  • Apr 30, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Apr 30, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

Money around this bill

1 lobbying clients named this bill on 1 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $420,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 51 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.

More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.

Kat Cammack, the sponsor, reported $799,000 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.

  • Susan B Anthony List — $420,000 on 1 filing

Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (6,022 characters) on Oct 3, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.

As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Federal ban on abortion procedure creates private right to sue doctors” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr8603 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.