QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal funding for municipal piers expanded under resilience program

H.R. 8508 — Piers Reinvestment Act · Filed by Robert Garcia (D-CA) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 27, 2026 · Referred to committee

95%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
5/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Infrastructure Funding Expansion

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill amends federal transportation law to make municipal piers eligible for two existing federal grant programs: resilience improvement grants and at-risk coastal infrastructure grants. It also increases the authorization for one of these programs from $300 million to $500 million. The bill allows cities and towns to apply for federal money to strengthen, upgrade, or improve their public piers.

Why we flagged it

The bill straightforwardly expands eligibility for existing federal resilience and coastal infrastructure grant programs to include municipal piers, and increases the appropriation ceiling. It is a routine amendment to transportation law that broadens access to public infrastructure funding.

What the text implies

  • The $200 million increase in authorization (from $300M to $500M) does not automatically appropriate funds—Congress must still pass appropriations legislation. The bill's effect depends on future budget decisions.
  • Eligibility expansion may increase competition for grants among municipalities, potentially reducing per-project funding if total appropriations do not rise proportionally.
  • The bill does not specify criteria for pier selection or prioritization, leaving those decisions to the Department of Transportation under existing program rules.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

Ordinary citizens in coastal communities gain access to federal funding for public pier infrastructure that supports resilience, recreation, commerce, and transportation. The bill expands eligibility for existing programs without restricting any citizen rights or protections.

Who stands to gain

  • construction and engineering firms contracted for pier work
  • municipal governments and port authorities

Named in the bill

Department of Transportation, 23 U.S.C. § 176, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Section 11101(b)(1)(E)(i)(V), Promoting Resilient Operations for Transformative, Efficient, and Cost-saving Transportation (PROTEC

Where it stands

2 cosponsors: 2 Democrats.

  • Apr 27, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Apr 27, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure · Congress.gov: “Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (776 characters) on Aug 20, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Federal funding for municipal piers expanded under resilience program” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr8508 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.