Congress moves to deregulate silencers, removing federal tracking and tax requirements
H.R. 850 — SHUSH Act · Filed by Michael Cloud (R-TX) · 18 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 31, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill removes federal regulation of firearm silencers by striking them from the National Firearms Act's definition of regulated 'firearms' and eliminating federal registration, licensing, and tax requirements that currently apply to silencer purchases. It also preempts state and local silencer taxes, registration, and recordkeeping rules. The primary beneficiaries are silencer manufacturers and gun owners seeking to purchase silencers without federal oversight, registration, or the current $200 tax stamp.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is the removal of federal regulatory oversight—registration, licensing, taxation, and tracking—from a class of firearm accessories. This is functionally a deregulation bill, though framed as 'equal treatment.' The acronym 'SHUSH Act' is a playful reference to silencer function, not a concealment signal.
What the text implies
- Elimination of the $200 federal tax stamp and registration requirement removes a financial and administrative barrier to silencer acquisition, potentially increasing their prevalence and reducing law enforcement's ability to trace silencer-equipped weapons used in crimes.
- Preemption of state and local silencer taxes and registration rules prevents states from maintaining their own regulatory frameworks, centralizing deregulation at the federal level and removing a layer of local democratic control over firearm accessories.
- Removal of silencers from federal firearms definitions may create ambiguity in how existing federal penalties for crimes involving silencer-equipped firearms are enforced, potentially weakening prosecutorial tools.
- The bill's retroactive application to transfers after October 22, 2015 (Section 2(b)(2)) may create a windfall for prior purchasers who paid the $200 tax, raising fairness questions without addressing refunds or credits.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Ordinary citizens lose federal oversight of a device designed to reduce gunshot detection, which law enforcement and public-safety experts identify as a tool that can facilitate undetected shootings and complicate crime investigation. The removal of registration and tracking requirements eliminates a transparency mechanism that aids law enforcement in tracing weapons used in crimes.
Who stands to gain
- firearm silencer manufacturers
- firearms retailers and distributors
- gun owners (reduced acquisition cost and regulatory burden)
Named in the bill
Internal Revenue Code Section 5845(a), Internal Revenue Code Section 5811, Internal Revenue Code Section 5841, National Firearms Act, Title 18 United States Code Chapter 44, Title 18 Section 921(a), Title 18 Section 924, Title 18 Section 926B, Title 18 Section 926C, Title 18 Section 927
Where it stands
18 cosponsors: 18 Republicans.
- Jan 31, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
- Jan 31, 2025 — Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary and House Committee on Ways and Means · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
3 lobbying clients named this bill on 5 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $4,349,548 in lobbying spend. A filing names 87 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 61% of bills with at least one filing.
Michael Cloud, the sponsor, reported $219,270 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle. $1,000 of that came from 1 PAC tied to these lobbying clients.
- Fedex Corporation — $2,930,000 on 1 filing
- National Rifle Association of America — $990,000 on 2 filings
- National Association for Gun Rights — $429,548 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 22, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (2,842 characters) on Sep 7, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,398 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 22, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-23.
“Congress moves to deregulate silencers, removing federal tracking and tax requirements” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr850 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.