QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress moves to block $38B detention expansion, redirect funds to health care

H.R. 8494 — To prohibit the Department of Homeland Security from entering into, modifying, extending, or renewing, any contract or intergovernmental service agreement to establish or operate any new immigration detention model, including the use of warehouses, modular facilities, soft-sided structures, tent systems, and processing centers. · Filed by Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) · 25 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 23, 2026 · Referred to committee

92%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
8/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Immigration Detention Restriction

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill prohibits the Department of Homeland Security from entering into new contracts or agreements to build, operate, or expand immigration detention facilities using warehouses, modular units, tents, or similar structures. It also blocks the use of federal funds for these facilities and redirects any money already obligated for them toward affordable health care and housing.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a direct prohibition on DHS contracting for new detention models and a spending freeze on such facilities. It is a regulatory constraint on executive branch detention infrastructure, not a subsidy, carve-out, or commemorative measure.

What the text implies

  • Redirection of obligated funds to health care and housing may require appropriations action or face legal challenge if funds are already committed under existing contracts.
  • The definition of 'new immigration model' as 'newly created, rebranded, temporary, emergency, or alternative detention framework' is broad and may create ambiguity about whether modifications to existing facilities trigger the prohibition.
  • The bill does not address existing detention contracts or facilities, only new ones — current detention infrastructure remains unaffected.
  • Surrounding communities may experience reduced local economic activity if detention facility construction was planned, but also avoid infrastructure strain and surveillance expansion.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

The bill protects detained immigrants and surrounding communities from harmful detention expansion and redirects funds to health care and housing — a public benefit. However, it constrains DHS's operational flexibility in immigration enforcement, which may increase costs elsewhere or create operational friction; the net civic effect depends on whether detention expansion was necessary for public safety or primarily served to expand incarceration of vulnerable populations.

Who stands to gain

  • construction and detention facility contractors (negatively affected — contracts blocked)
  • health care and housing service providers (positively affected — redirected funds)

Named in the bill

Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, House Committee on Homeland Security, House Committee on the Judiciary

Where it stands

25 cosponsors: 25 Democrats.

  • Apr 23, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in House”
  • Apr 23, 2026 — Referred to House Committee on Homeland Security and House Committee on the Judiciary · Congress.gov: “Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a…”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

Money around this bill

2 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $30,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 13 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.

More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.

Rashida Tlaib, the sponsor, reported $42,050 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.

  • Moveon.org Civic Action — $20,000 on 1 filing
  • Casa, Inc. — $10,000 on 1 filing

Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 17, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (6,554 characters) on Oct 3, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.

As of — lobbying records through Jul 17, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Congress moves to block $38B detention expansion, redirect funds to health care” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/hr8494 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.