Federal climate-health program targets pregnant women in vulnerable communities
H.R. 8397 — Protecting Moms and Babies Against Climate Change Act · Filed by Lauren Underwood (D-IL) · 71 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 21, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates three federal programs to protect pregnant people and infants from climate-related health risks. First, it funds 10 regional grant programs ($100M over 4 years) to provide climate-adaptation services—such as air conditioning, weatherization, mental health counseling, and training for health workers—in high-risk areas with elevated maternal mortality and climate exposure. Second, it funds health profession schools ($5M over 4 years) to integrate climate-health training into medical, nursing, and midwifery curricula. Third, it establishes an NIH research consortium to coordinate climate-maternal health research and identify data gaps. The bill prioritizes racial and ethnic disparities and requires grantees to prevent unintended harms like displacement or gentrification.
Why we flagged it
The bill establishes three coordinated federal grant and research programs focused on protecting pregnant individuals and infants from climate-related health risks through direct services, workforce training, and research infrastructure. It is fundamentally a public health intervention, not a financial or regulatory carve-out.
What the text implies
- The bill creates a new federal data infrastructure (Section 6 Strategy) that will map maternal health vulnerability at census-tract level, potentially enabling future targeted interventions or policy decisions based on granular demographic and health data.
- By requiring grantees to address 'gentrification-like' harms (rent increases, displacement) as unintended consequences, the bill implicitly acknowledges that climate adaptation projects can harm the vulnerable populations they aim to help—a tension that may complicate implementation.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
Community-based organizations and nonprofits (grant recipients); Health profession schools and academic medical centers (education grants); Minority-serving institutions (potential research partners)